In Focus: Pushing the advice boundary  

Implications of FCA 'polluter pays' proposals for DB transfer advice

  • Describe the FCA's 'polluter pays' proposals
  • Identify how they might affect defined benefit transfer firms
  • Identify how DB transfer firms should prepare for the new rules
CPD
Approx.30min
Implications of FCA 'polluter pays' proposals for DB transfer advice
The FCA is proposing to require firms to set aside capital for potential redress liabilities arising from designated investment activities. (FT Fotoware)

The Financial Conduct Authority's 'polluter pays' proposals could have significant implications for personal investment firms.

The Financial Services Compensation Scheme paid £760mn in redress due to unsuitable advice given by personal investment firms between 2016 and 2022. An astonishing 95 per cent of this redress involved only 75 firms.

In light of this finding, the FCA wants what it calls 'polluter firms' – those who have “got things wrong” – to hold sufficient funds to meet their own redress obligations, rather than effectively passing the cost to other firms through the FSCS levy.

Article continues after advert

In particular, in consultation paper CP23/24 "Capital deduction for redress: personal investment firms", issued November last year, the FCA is proposing to require firms to set aside capital for potential redress liabilities arising from designated investment activities.

The calculations would allow for a probability factor, reflecting that not all potential redress liabilities will result in a redress outcome.

The capital to cover potential redress liabilities would be deducted from the firm’s capital resources.

If the firm is undercapitalised after this deduction has been made, it will have to comply with asset restriction rules.

These rules would prevent the firm from carrying out transactions not deemed by the FCA to be “in the ordinary course of business”.

The FCA will also use new reporting requirements to direct their supervisory process. Firms will need to provide the aggregate value of redress liabilities and the number of consumers affected. They will also be expected to keep records of how they have arrived at their stated redress liabilities.

Alongside the polluter pays proposals, the FCA is consulting on a wider review of the regulatory regime for personal investment firms. The aim is to move towards a more comprehensive regime that would incorporate:

  • New regulatory rules around capital and liquidity adequacy.
  • Improved risk management requirements.
  • More extensive reporting and disclosure requirements.
  • Wind down planning requirements.

The consultation was accompanied by a ‘Dear CEO’ letter, reminding firms not to avoid their redress commitments.

Expectations of firms as proposed by the FCA (Source: First Actuarial)

When will the changes take effect?

The changes are expected to come into effect in the first half of 2025.

The consultation closes on March 20 2024 and the FCA plans to issue a policy statement in the second half of this year. There will then be a period of at least six months for firms to prepare for the changes.

Which firms are affected?

The FCA expects around 4,900 firms to fall within the scope of the proposals. 

Exemptions will apply for some personal investment firms – most notably sole traders and unlimited partnerships. However, exemptions for these firms will only apply to the asset retention requirements.

This means that they will still be expected to identify and quantify their redress liabilities, and to report to the FCA on their findings.

They will then decide on the need for any action, such as imposing bespoke asset retention requirements on firms that are assessed to be undercapitalised.

A broader exemption will apply to personal investment firms that are part of a group and are subject to group supervision by either the FCA or the Prudential Regulation Authority.